WARWICK DAVIS

Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows: Part 2

Naked ViewerJune 17, 2016

RELEASED 2011 RUNTIME 130 MIN LANGUAGE ENGLISH DIRECTION DAVID YATES SCREENPLAY STEVE KLOVES STARRING DANIEL RADCLIFFE, RUPERT GRINT, EMMA WATSON, HELENA BONHAM... Read More...

2011AdventureFantasyFilmFranchise

Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows: Part 1

Naked ViewerJune 17, 2016

RELEASED 2010 RUNTIME 146 MIN LANGUAGE ENGLISH DIRECTION DAVID YATES SCREENPLAY STEVE KLOVES STARRING DANIEL RADCLIFFE, RUPERT GRINT, EMMA WATSON, HELENA BONHAM... Read More...

2010AdventureDramaFantasyFilmFranchise

Harry Potter And The Half-Blood Prince

Naked ViewerJune 14, 2016

RELEASED 2009 RUNTIME 153 MIN LANGUAGE ENGLISH DIRECTION DAVID YATES SCREENPLAY STEVE KLOVES STARRING DANIEL RADCLIFFE, RUPERT GRINT, EMMA WATSON, JIM BROADBENT... Read More...

2009AdventureFamilyFantasyFilmFranchise

Harry Potter And The Order Of The Phoenix

Naked ViewerJune 14, 2016

RELEASED 2007 RUNTIME 138 MIN LANGUAGE ENGLISH DIRECTION DAVID YATES SCREENPLAY MICHAEL GOLDENBERG STARRING DANIEL RADCLIFFE, RUPERT GRINT, EMMA WATSON, HELENA ... Read More...

2007AdventureFamilyFantasyFilmFranchise

Harry Potter And The Chamber Of Secrets

Naked ViewerMay 10, 2016

RELEASED 2002 RUNTIME 161 MIN LANGUAGE ENGLISH DIRECTION CHRIS COLUMBUS SCREENPLAY STEVE KLOVES STARRING DANIEL RADCLIFFE, RUPERT GRINT, EMMA WATSON, KENNETH BR... Read More...

2002AdventureFamilyFantasyFilmFranchise

Harry Potter And The Philosopher’s Stone

Naked ViewerMay 10, 2016

RELEASED 2001 RUNTIME 152 MIN LANGUAGE ENGLISH DIRECTION CHRIS COLUMBUS SCREENPLAY STEVE KLOVES STARRING DANIEL RADCLIFFE, RUPERT GRINT, EMMA WATSON, JOHN CLEES... Read More...

2001AdventureFamilyFantasyFilmFranchise

The categories in the box on the left inside the post do not reflect a score, but the tone of the movie.
A full bar in ACTION does not reflect that the action is amazing, but that there is a maximum amount of action.
The same way an empty bar in SUSPENSE doesn't say the suspense sucks, but rather there is no suspense at all.

AMBITION reflects how willing the moviemakers were in breaking new grounds in terms of subject matter, storytelling and/or technical breakthroughs.

CHALLENGE reflects, if the movie is easy to understand (empty bar) or requires your full amount of brain power (full bar).

When I review a movie I look at a few things. Is it an interesting story, or have I seen it done million times before? Is the script written well or does it confuse the viewer? How are the performances by the actors?

However, since my background is art and design I tend to pay a lot of attention to technical things like the cinematography and overall visual style, which includes visual effects and music (soundtracks and original scores).

Ambition is also very important to me. I can forgive a bad movie, when I see that the filmmakers went for something big - something new and groundbreaking, but maybe didn't quite reach it yet.

But the most important thing is of course. Did I enjoy the movie?

With new movies it's easy. Did I enjoy it when I watched it initially? That doesn't mean my view won't change over time.
When re-watching older movies I grew up with I'm looking, if it holds up, visual-wise and story-wise. But even though I try to keep an objective mind with each re-watch, nostalgia will always factor into my score. After all, I am a human being with a soul ;)

Top 10

Top 10 Comic Book Movies

Top 10 Movies Of 2014

Top 10 Movies Of 2015

Other Topics

Welcome to NakedMovieViews!

88th Academy Awards Predictions