JOHN RHYS-DAVIES

Lord Of The Rings: Return Of The King (Extended Cut)

Naked ViewerOctober 25, 2015

RELEASED 2003 RUNTIME 263 MIN LANGUAGE ENGLISH DIRECTION PETER JACKSON SCREENPLAY FRAN WALSH, PHILIPPA BOYENS, PETER JACKSON STARRING ELIJAH WOOD, IAN McKELLEN,... Read More...

2003AdventureDramaFantasyFilmFranchise

Lord Of The Rings: The Two Towers (Extended Cut)

Naked ViewerOctober 25, 2015

RELEASED 2002 RUNTIME 251 MIN LANGUAGE ENGLISH DIRECTION PETER JACKSON SCREENPLAY FRAN WALSH, PHILIPPA BOYENS, STEPHEN SINCLAIR, PETER JACKSON STARRING ELIJAH W... Read More...

2002AdventureDramaFantasyFilmFranchise

Lord Of The Rings: The Fellowship Of The Ring (Extended Cut)

Naked ViewerOctober 25, 2015

RELEASED 2001 RUNTIME 238 MIN LANGUAGE ENGLISH DIRECTION PETER JACKSON SCREENPLAY FRAN WALSH, PHILIPPA BOYENS, PETER JACKSON STARRING ELIJAH WOOD, IAN McKELLEN,... Read More...

2001AdventureDramaFantasyFilmFranchise

Indiana Jones And The Last Crusade

Naked ViewerOctober 25, 2015

RELEASED 1989 RUNTIME 127 MIN LANGUAGE ENGLISH DIRECTION STEVEN SPIELBERG SCREENPLAY JEFFREY BOAM STARRING HARRISON FORD, DENHOLM ELLIOTT, ALISON DOODY, JOHN RH... Read More...

1989ActionAdventureFilmFranchisePeriod

Raiders Of The Lost Ark

Naked ViewerOctober 25, 2015

RELEASED 1981 RUNTIME 115 MIN LANGUAGE ENGLISH DIRECTION STEVEN SPIELBERG SCREENPLAY LAWRENCE KASDAN STARRING HARRISON FORD, KAREN ALLEN, PAUL FREEMAN, RONALD L... Read More...

ActionAdventureFilmFranchisePeriod

The categories in the box on the left inside the post do not reflect a score, but the tone of the movie.
A full bar in ACTION does not reflect that the action is amazing, but that there is a maximum amount of action.
The same way an empty bar in SUSPENSE doesn't say the suspense sucks, but rather there is no suspense at all.

AMBITION reflects how willing the moviemakers were in breaking new grounds in terms of subject matter, storytelling and/or technical breakthroughs.

CHALLENGE reflects, if the movie is easy to understand (empty bar) or requires your full amount of brain power (full bar).

When I review a movie I look at a few things. Is it an interesting story, or have I seen it done million times before? Is the script written well or does it confuse the viewer? How are the performances by the actors?

However, since my background is art and design I tend to pay a lot of attention to technical things like the cinematography and overall visual style, which includes visual effects and music (soundtracks and original scores).

Ambition is also very important to me. I can forgive a bad movie, when I see that the filmmakers went for something big - something new and groundbreaking, but maybe didn't quite reach it yet.

But the most important thing is of course. Did I enjoy the movie?

With new movies it's easy. Did I enjoy it when I watched it initially? That doesn't mean my view won't change over time.
When re-watching older movies I grew up with I'm looking, if it holds up, visual-wise and story-wise. But even though I try to keep an objective mind with each re-watch, nostalgia will always factor into my score. After all, I am a human being with a soul ;)

Top 10

Top 10 Comic Book Movies

Top 10 Movies Of 2014

Top 10 Movies Of 2015

Other Topics

Welcome to NakedMovieViews!

88th Academy Awards Predictions

JOHN RHYS-DAVIES

Lord Of The Rings: Return Of The King (Extended Cut)

Lord Of The Rings: The Two Towers (Extended Cut)

Lord Of The Rings: The Fellowship Of The Ring (Extended Cut)

Indiana Jones And The Last Crusade

Raiders Of The Lost Ark